So, let’s get something straight right now. There have been only two documented assaults by mobs attributed to the right-wing both of which have roundly condemned by Republican leaders and none of which were Republican. First, there was Charlottesville riots from 2017 in which President Trump, Melania Trump, and Ivanka along with numerous Republican leaders condemned the violence from both sides and disavowed any and all groups involved in the violence.
Second, and just last week, a mob of protestors, calling themselves the Proud Boys1)The Proud Boys are not a Republican group but a group originally founded as a White Nationalist group that subsequently disavowed White Nationalism because of its racist programs. The Proud Boys now purport to advocate for Western Values, not racist ones., confronted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi with vulgar shouts and threats of violence.
National political leaders, both Democrat and Republican, were quick to condemn and disavow the attack and its purpetrators. the Proud Boys. However, the disavowels were singularly different. The Democrat leaders (including Ms. Pelosi) limited their criticism to the Proud Boys and said nothing about having actively, explicitly, and often openly encouraging mob violence to be exercised against conservatives and Republicans.
Now, let’s begin this post with an explict enumeration of the Democrat-encouraged violence exercised against the Republicans in the recent past:
Here’s the thing: though there is no question that the GOP, like Democrats, play to the anxieties of its base — this is normal politics — there really were, and are, mobs out to get conservatives.
Conservatives didn’t just imagine the anti-Kavanaugh protesters filling the halls of Congress, harassing GOP senators. Conservatives aren’t imagining campus mobs shouting down conservatives. Republican political consultants didn’t invent the mob at Middlebury College last year that chased Charles Murray off of campus, and physically injured a (liberal) professor who was his host. Nor did the GOP conjure the Yale mob that abused the Christakises over Halloween costumes in 2016.
And on and on. More to the point, Republicans did not invent the mob-like behavior of the news media in the Kavanaugh affair. In the last 24 hours, I’ve heard from three friends — two Democrats, and one anti-Republican independent — who have written to express profound concern about this political moment, and the behavior of the liberal mob. One of the Democrats — no fan of Trump or Kavanaugh — told me that her party has lost her over all this. The independent told me he hasn’t voted GOP in 30 years, but that may change this November, because of the “malice” (his word) on the left. And the third remains a devoted Democrat, but he is agonizing over the demons now taking over his political side, and worries if they can ever be reined in.
In “After Kavanaugh,” Kevin Williamson adds, “The Democrats have created an environment that will render ordinary political discourse almost impossible for years to come:”
This has been shameful, and there should be a reckoning.
That reckoning will not come from the New York Times or from the faculty of the Yale Law School. And it will not come from mind-killed partisans who will believe — or at least pretend to believe — anything that justifies and facilitates their pursuit of power. “She sounded credible to me!” they say. People who are telling us what we want to hear often do. That isn’t good enough — and this cynical smear campaign cannot be allowed to go unanswered. Everybody likes to think that they would have had the good sense and spine to stand against Senator Joseph McCarthy or the House Un-American Activities Committee.
But as the Democrats in rodential retreat go slinking sideways away from this failed attempt at character assassination, what will we do? Not only in November, but after? They would very much like to make this election about Donald Trump, but this has very little to do with the president. They tried to do the same thing to Mitt Romney that they tried with Brett Kavanaugh, and they would have done the same thing if it had been President Romney naming a new justice.
If you don’t punish a political party for this, what do you punish one for?
Indeed. And how does the media recover from their role in the anti-Kavanaugh debacle? The Washington Free Beacon notes that Joe Scarborough(!) “issued a pointed challenge to editors across the country:”
“I challenge New York Times reporters this morning — not reporters, editors — I challenge Washington Post editors, I challenge Wall Street Journal editors, I challenge editors across America, write that story. What happened with Dr. Ford’s agreement with a congresswoman, with Dianne Feinstein? Why did they leak that story? And more importantly, look at yourself and ask yourself the question, why didn’t we report on this in real time when you sure as hell would have reported on it if [Sen. Chuck] Grassley (R., Iowa) and his office had done the same thing?”
Just think of the media as Democratic operatives with bylines, and it all makes sense — or as “Comfortably Smug” tweets, “Journalists are the most insidious of paid protesters.”
Footnotes [ + ]
|1.||↑||The Proud Boys are not a Republican group but a group originally founded as a White Nationalist group that subsequently disavowed White Nationalism because of its racist programs. The Proud Boys now purport to advocate for Western Values, not racist ones.|