NOTE To Lefties II: Suck It Up Snowflake

Way before Trump the Left has been accusing conservatives as racists, homophobes, sexists, and sub-human haters, and much worse. You would think they could, oh, advance a principle or two other than “Orange-man bad”.


Posted in Leftism, Political violence, Politics, Progressivism, Trump Derangement Syndrome, Violence | Leave a comment

Links For The Compleat Climate Denier

Most (All?) so-called climate deniers  with whom I have conversations, hav known or with whom I have studied base their denials on an understanding of the empirical evidence used to justify anthropogenic Climate Change (aCC). You should pay special attention to the previous sentence because most who believe in catastrophic climate change due to human activity do not base their claims on empirical evidence and this is true of many (most?) scientists who support the catastrophic view. They all seem to have the following in common: (1) they take a political postion, almost always Leftist (e.g., only government can save us), (2) argumentum ad verecundiam((appeal to authority)), or (3) both. This is why the scaffold of evidence upon which advocates for aCC base their arguments, fall apart when examined critically.

So, if you, like me, are a proud climate denier, then these are the links for you.

HINT: if you value your Lefty friends and don’t want to antagonize (or lose) them, then DO NOT send this post or any link(s) from this set of links in this post. Most will not read them because reasons.

Without further ado, then, here are the links the climate advocates have not read AND will not read because ignorance permits them to live in fantasy land where catastrophe is just over the horizon.


American Thinker: The Problem With Anthropogenic Global Warming

Here is a very good article about Climate Change by climate scientist John Christy that wonderfully summarizes the state of the art in climate change research (and that also describes the unwillingness of the climate change modelling community to correct their models in the face of empirical observations to the contrary).

Since reason and science do not work, use satire.

Fighting the Blacklist (With Comment by Steve)

The Truth About Climate Change

The Complex Physics of Global Warming

How Much of Atmospheric CO2 Increase is Natural?

WebMD Misleads

So, what if there is no such thing (scientifically speaking) of a “Global Climate”?

The Great Lakes reveal the fatal flaw in Global Warming

Climate Alarmism by Bjorn Lomborg

Climate Alarmists: The Summer of Their Discontent

It doesn’t exist: Empirical Evidence for aCC

How To Discuss Climate Change with a “Climate Alarmist”

Questioning Global Warming

How Solar Power Has Wrecked Australia’s Power Grid

Is Global Warming Theory Scientific?

The Politics of Climate Change Alarmism

You’ll Need a Bigger Blog: How much is Climate Alarmism Based on Scientific Fraud?

No. Next Question: Is Global Warming Killing Off the Polar Bears?

Unexpectedly: Global Warming Is a Hoax

Are We All Gonna Die? The Climate Hoax

Nah, scientists don’t do these things: NOAA didn’t like the data so they erased it and also here and here.

Surprise! Media misrepresents Climate Study.

Say it isn’t so: How climate alarmism is politically useful, even when the science is fraudulent

Web Sites of Note

The Climate Skeptic


CO2 Is Life

Polar Bears and Climate Change

Posted in Climate Change, Politics, Science | Leave a comment

NOTE To Lefties: Suck It Up Snowflake

As it has been written, “For as ye sew the wind so shall ye reap the whirlwind“.

Note to Lefties: what goes around, comes around and you deserve every bit and more of what President Trump dishes out in response to your lies and vicious calumny. He wages war by the same rules you do so suck it up, snowflake.

You’ve claimed Trump is a white supremacist (not true), a Nazi (exposing your own ignorance), that he is running concentration camps (more ignorance – willful this time), a child abuser, a child killer, a racist (objectively not true), that he’s committed incest with his daughter, that he’s anti-semitic (laughably not true), a retard, a cheeto, a rapist, Hitler, a Russion spy, a crook,a murderer, a genocidal maniac, blah, blah, blah. You’ve called his supporters Nazis (and what a stupid, ignorant claim this is), knuckle-draggers, bigots, etc.

But when Trump calls out you progressive morons you melt like hail in August, throw tantrums, run to the fainting couches, and double down on your evil invective. As for these loony women, do they condemn terror attacks – Yesterday’s or last week’s Antifa attack on an ICE facility, or even 9/11? No.

Never have I seen any pearl-clutching by the Left when these hateful, false, and vicious progressive women launch their calumnies at Trump (or when a Lefty attempts to murder Republican congressmen, or Antifa brutalizes college students, or attempts to blow up an ICE facility. But, whoaaaa baby! Look what happens when these vindictive lefty women get called out for their gutter invective. Their crocodile tears flood the MSM networks.


Posted in Ethics and Morality | Leave a comment

The Heavenly Compact: America and Israel

‘Ancient Principles’ Birthed the Greatest Nation the World Has Ever Known

By Trevor Thomas

From the article,

in order to persuade his fellow delegates to vote in favor of the Constitution, Samuel Langdon, a distinguished theologian and scholar, delivered an “election sermon” entitled, The Republic of the Israelites an Example to the American States.

After beginning by quoting Deuteronomy 4:5-8 in his sermon, Langdon noted,

[T]he Israelites may be considered as a pattern to the world in all ages; and from them we may learn what will exalt our character, and what will depress and bring us to ruin. Let us therefore look over their constitution and laws, enquire into their practice, and observe how their prosperity and fame depended on their strict observance of the divine commands both as to their government and religion.

Langdon then gave an account of how Moses, upon the wise counsel of his father-in-law Jethro, “the priest of Midian,” set up a republican form of government, with representatives (“leaders,” “rulers,” “judges,” depending on the biblical translation) from groups of thousands, hundreds, fifties, and tens. In addition, 70 elders, or wise-men — a type of national Senate as described by biblical and Jewish scholars — were selected by Moses and approved by the consent of the people.

Langdon added,

A government thus settled on republican principles, required laws; without which it must have degenerated immediately into aristocracy, or absolute monarchy. But God did not leave a people, wholly unskilled in legislation, to make laws for themselves: he took this important matter wholly into His own hands, and beside the moral laws of the two tables, which directed their conduct as individuals, gave them by Moses a complete code of judicial laws.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment